Skip to main content

About your Search

20121001
20121001
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)
dates of the warren court. and there was a real liberal agenda. every saturday morning chief justice warren and his great deputy meet together and they would say what cases do we want to take, what do we want to move along? they had ideas about how to move the law. year after year they changed cases -- they changed the law. 1964, justice brennan's famous opinion in your times against sullivan revolutionized by the law. 1965 justice william o. douglas, griswold v. connecticut, the case that established the right to privacy that married couples should not be denied the right to buy birth control. 1966, miranda versus arizona, revolutionizing criminal procedure and perhaps more importantly changing television dramas for ever. [laughter] >> 1967, perhaps the best named case in supreme court history, loving v. virginia. what was it about? it was the case that said states could no longer ban racial intermarriage. think about that, 1967. there are people in this room who were on live in 1967. [laughter] and it was still illegal in a lot of states for racial intermarriage. when barack obama'
may sing about galaxy travel, but despises cell phones and the web. warren buffett bearish on technology. angelina jolie jokes about her technophobia. and last year wynonna ryder. >> the man doesn't e-mail or carry a phone. >> i am a millionaire that's the difference. >> reporter: the lack of access? >> for me it doesn't matter. you see, i think it is you who is sweating this. >> reporter: okay, christopher walken. for us working stiffs we can't escape technology, morning, noon, and night. the power to unplug is a luxury we can't afford. well, maybe just this once. tuning in and logging out, tanya rivero, abc news, new york. >> i dream of turning it off. >> you can. you can. >> i can. but i'll get in trouble. it brings us to our facebook question of the day. >> we want to know honestly hong do you think you could go without e-mail. log on to wnnfans.com. and weigh in. >> i think i would rather. i honestly think i could go without e-mail except for work purposes, i would probably get fired. i look communicating in short sentences, get right to the point. i can do the texting
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3 (some duplicates have been removed)